Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025
Disease course after pregnancy in women with progressive multiple sclerosis symptoms.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shipley Jessica, Beadnall Heidi N, Sanfilippo Paul G, Horakova Dana, Boz Cavit, Prat Alexandre, Ozakbas Serkan, Kalincik Tomas, Roos Izanne, Altintas Ayse, Eichau Sara, Skibina Olga, Alroughani Raed, Patti Francesco, Etemadifar Masoud, Lugaresi Alessandra, Tomassini Valentina, Butzkueven Helmut, van der Walt Anneke, Jokubaitis Vilija G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The impact of pregnancy on disease outcomes has not been characterised in women with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotypes. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and disease course of women who experienced a pregnancy after a diagnosis of primary progressive MS (PPMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS).
METHODS: This multicentre observational cohort study utilised data from the international MSBase Registry extracted on 2 June 2024. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of women with progressive MS were assessed up to 10 years postpartum and compared to those of propensity score-matched women with progressive MS without a pregnancy history.
RESULTS: In total, 138 women with 164 pregnancies were included in the study, comprising 75 women with PPMS and 63 with SPMS. Of these, 24 women with PPMS and 47 with SPMS had longitudinal peri-pregnancy EDSS assessments and were included in the analysis of disability scores. A history of pregnancy was not associated with a significant difference in long-term disability trajectories in women with either PPMS (estimate = -0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.07 to 0.04) or SPMS (estimate = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.03).
CONCLUSION: A history of pregnancy is not associated with a significant difference in long-term disability in women with progressive MS symptoms.
METHODS: This multicentre observational cohort study utilised data from the international MSBase Registry extracted on 2 June 2024. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of women with progressive MS were assessed up to 10 years postpartum and compared to those of propensity score-matched women with progressive MS without a pregnancy history.
RESULTS: In total, 138 women with 164 pregnancies were included in the study, comprising 75 women with PPMS and 63 with SPMS. Of these, 24 women with PPMS and 47 with SPMS had longitudinal peri-pregnancy EDSS assessments and were included in the analysis of disability scores. A history of pregnancy was not associated with a significant difference in long-term disability trajectories in women with either PPMS (estimate = -0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.07 to 0.04) or SPMS (estimate = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.03).
CONCLUSION: A history of pregnancy is not associated with a significant difference in long-term disability in women with progressive MS symptoms.