MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of endodontics · 2023
Effect of Proximal Caries-driven Access on the Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nawar Nawar Naguib, Abdelfattah Roaa Abdelwahab, Kataia Mohamed, Saber Shehabeldin Mohamed, Kataia Engy Medhat, Kim Hyeon-Cheol
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the effects from the carious cavity and access from it on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars using finite element analysis (FEA).
METHODS: A maxillary premolar was used to compare 3 types of access cavity related to having a proximal carious defect: caries-driven access (CDA), conservative access that has a mesial component (MCA), as well as traditional access with the same mesial component (MTA). Cyclic loading was simulated on the occlusal surface, and number of cycles until failure (NCF) was compared with the intact tooth model (IT). Mathematical analysis was done to evaluate the stress distribution patterns and calculated maximum von Mises (vM) and maximum principal stresses (MPS), with emphasis on pericervical region as a specific area of interest.
RESULTS: Maximum vM registered on the IT was 6.14 MPa. CDA provided the highest NCF with 92.28% of the IT, followed by MCA (84.90%) and MTA (83.79%). The vM and MPS analysis showed that the stress values and patterns are affected more by the proximity of the occlusal load to the tooth/restoration interface. Concerning the pericervical region, maximum vM was registered for IT (4.11 MPa), followed by CDA (4.85 MPa) and then MCA (8.13 MPa) and MTA (8.61 MPa), whereas the MPS analysis revealed that CDA showed the highest magnitude of tensile stresses.
CONCLUSIONS: A proximal CDA benefits the mechanical properties of maxillary premolars; however, its impact on the biological aspect should be assessed to provide a ruling for/against it.
METHODS: A maxillary premolar was used to compare 3 types of access cavity related to having a proximal carious defect: caries-driven access (CDA), conservative access that has a mesial component (MCA), as well as traditional access with the same mesial component (MTA). Cyclic loading was simulated on the occlusal surface, and number of cycles until failure (NCF) was compared with the intact tooth model (IT). Mathematical analysis was done to evaluate the stress distribution patterns and calculated maximum von Mises (vM) and maximum principal stresses (MPS), with emphasis on pericervical region as a specific area of interest.
RESULTS: Maximum vM registered on the IT was 6.14 MPa. CDA provided the highest NCF with 92.28% of the IT, followed by MCA (84.90%) and MTA (83.79%). The vM and MPS analysis showed that the stress values and patterns are affected more by the proximity of the occlusal load to the tooth/restoration interface. Concerning the pericervical region, maximum vM was registered for IT (4.11 MPa), followed by CDA (4.85 MPa) and then MCA (8.13 MPa) and MTA (8.61 MPa), whereas the MPS analysis revealed that CDA showed the highest magnitude of tensile stresses.
CONCLUSIONS: A proximal CDA benefits the mechanical properties of maxillary premolars; however, its impact on the biological aspect should be assessed to provide a ruling for/against it.