Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2006
[Clinical investigation of the combined therapy on deformed fingers after burn injury].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Xuewen, Ceng Ying, Shi Jianlin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the benefit of the combined therapy for deformed fingers after burn injury by comparing with the conventional one, and to sum up some experience.
METHODS: From June 1999 to June 2004, 56 patients with deformed fingers entered the trial. In 28 patients of treatment group who received combined therapy (operation with post operational systematic convalescent care, group A), there were 20 males and 8 females (14-47 years), 129 fingers of 47 hands were involved. In 28 of conventional group who received conventional therapy (the same operational principle, and self-convalescent-care with out-patient service guidance, group B), there were 17 males and 11 females (18-51 years), 107 fingers of 42 hands were involved. Before and after the therapy, the finger's motor function were assessed according to the Swanson method. The hand's motor function was assessed through the Nine Hole Peg Test.
RESULTS: The follow-up was 12-19 months in group A and 13-20 months in group B. The index of ankylosis (IA) of group A before therapy was 82% +/- 20%, and 45% +/- 13% after therapy; while the IA of group B before therapy was 78% +/- 17%, and 52% +/- 14% after therapy. The decreased of IA between before therapy and after therapy was 37% +/- 15% in group A, and 26% +/- 15% in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The Nine Hole Peg Test value of group A was 28.34 +/- 5.62 s before therapy, and 20.73 +/- 4.25 s after therapy; while that of group B was 27.47 +/- 5.78 s before therapy, and 21.86 +/- 4.12 s after therapy. The decrease of the Nine Hole Peg Test value between before therapy and after therapy was 7.61 +/- 2.27 s in group A, and 5.61 +/- 2.94 s in group B, showing statistically significant difference (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The combined therapy is more effective than the conventional one.
METHODS: From June 1999 to June 2004, 56 patients with deformed fingers entered the trial. In 28 patients of treatment group who received combined therapy (operation with post operational systematic convalescent care, group A), there were 20 males and 8 females (14-47 years), 129 fingers of 47 hands were involved. In 28 of conventional group who received conventional therapy (the same operational principle, and self-convalescent-care with out-patient service guidance, group B), there were 17 males and 11 females (18-51 years), 107 fingers of 42 hands were involved. Before and after the therapy, the finger's motor function were assessed according to the Swanson method. The hand's motor function was assessed through the Nine Hole Peg Test.
RESULTS: The follow-up was 12-19 months in group A and 13-20 months in group B. The index of ankylosis (IA) of group A before therapy was 82% +/- 20%, and 45% +/- 13% after therapy; while the IA of group B before therapy was 78% +/- 17%, and 52% +/- 14% after therapy. The decreased of IA between before therapy and after therapy was 37% +/- 15% in group A, and 26% +/- 15% in group B, showing significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The Nine Hole Peg Test value of group A was 28.34 +/- 5.62 s before therapy, and 20.73 +/- 4.25 s after therapy; while that of group B was 27.47 +/- 5.78 s before therapy, and 21.86 +/- 4.12 s after therapy. The decrease of the Nine Hole Peg Test value between before therapy and after therapy was 7.61 +/- 2.27 s in group A, and 5.61 +/- 2.94 s in group B, showing statistically significant difference (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The combined therapy is more effective than the conventional one.