Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
Dividends and Disconnects: Involving Public and Stakeholder Groups in the Development of a Modelling Study Exploring Income Policy and Health.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamilton Olivia K L, Fergie Gillian, Shimonovich Michal, McHardy Fiona, Kopasker Daniel, Silverman Eric, Craig Peter, Gibson Marcia, Munford Luke, Brown Heather, Katikireddi S Vittal, Thomson Rachel M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Policy models increasingly guide policy decision-making. Incorporating public and stakeholder perspectives into modelling processes can produce evidence that is more relevant, appropriate and acceptable to the public. However, public and stakeholder involvement (PSI) in modelling studies is an emerging practice in the field of health inequalities, with little guidance available to support researchers.
OBJECTIVE: We present a methodological reflection on a PSI process supporting development of a policy model estimating the health impacts of major income supplementation policies. We include a multi-layered systems map, co-developed with public and stakeholder contributors, which guided modelling strategy development.
METHODS: We engaged 32 people with lived experience of income insecurity and over 60 stakeholders with expertise in socio-economic determinants of health. Perspectives were gathered through three participatory systems mapping workshops and five policy prioritisation workshops. Workshop contributions were analysed using descriptive thematic analysis. Insights were fed back to the research team, who made changes or additions to the modelling strategy.
RESULTS: We experienced successes and challenges incorporating public and stakeholder perspectives into model development, specifically: engaging people with lived experience of income insecurity; ensuring PSI settings support effective engagement; and appropriately remunerating and safeguarding public contributors. We learned the importance of breaking down methodological silos within research teams to translate rich qualitative insights into actionable modelling outputs.
CONCLUSION: In data-driven modelling studies, PSI requires carefully considered design, strong collaboration between team members, and appropriate resourcing to create enjoyable, productive engagement spaces where contributors can safely share experiences and expertise.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT (PPIE) CONTRIBUTION: PSI was central to this work. Our project partners at The Poverty Alliance, a third sector organisation, facilitated involvement of people with lived experience of income insecurity using their internal trauma-informed approaches throughout all stages.
OBJECTIVE: We present a methodological reflection on a PSI process supporting development of a policy model estimating the health impacts of major income supplementation policies. We include a multi-layered systems map, co-developed with public and stakeholder contributors, which guided modelling strategy development.
METHODS: We engaged 32 people with lived experience of income insecurity and over 60 stakeholders with expertise in socio-economic determinants of health. Perspectives were gathered through three participatory systems mapping workshops and five policy prioritisation workshops. Workshop contributions were analysed using descriptive thematic analysis. Insights were fed back to the research team, who made changes or additions to the modelling strategy.
RESULTS: We experienced successes and challenges incorporating public and stakeholder perspectives into model development, specifically: engaging people with lived experience of income insecurity; ensuring PSI settings support effective engagement; and appropriately remunerating and safeguarding public contributors. We learned the importance of breaking down methodological silos within research teams to translate rich qualitative insights into actionable modelling outputs.
CONCLUSION: In data-driven modelling studies, PSI requires carefully considered design, strong collaboration between team members, and appropriate resourcing to create enjoyable, productive engagement spaces where contributors can safely share experiences and expertise.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT (PPIE) CONTRIBUTION: PSI was central to this work. Our project partners at The Poverty Alliance, a third sector organisation, facilitated involvement of people with lived experience of income insecurity using their internal trauma-informed approaches throughout all stages.