Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025
An exploratory qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures and disease-modifying therapies in adults with spinal muscular atrophy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Slayter Jeremy, Casey Lauren, McCullum Shane, Drost Dorothy, Banks Allison, O'Connell Colleen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To understand patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures, critical functional domains, and disease-modifying therapies in adult spinal muscular atrophy.
DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative single-site study.
PATIENTS: Ten adults with spinal muscular atrophy and two clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually or in person with participants after they completed outcome measures at a routine clinic visit. Two researchers analysed transcripts concurrently using a thematic approach to determine themes.
RESULTS: Ten themes were identified among partici-pants. Patient-reported outcome measure preference varied between functional groups and was under-responsive, although it captured meaningful data. Motor stability was most frequently expected with disease-modifying therapy, but participants also reported improved fatigue and respiratory status.
CONCLUSION: After considering patient goals, functional status, and preferences, patient-reported outcome measures represent a valuable adjunct to standard clinical and research tools. Optimal selection of patient-reported outcome measures requires careful consideration of multiple patient factors. Collaborative development of modified patient-reported outcome measures may yield a responsive, meaningful, and acceptable tool that can be used across a broad functional spectrum.
DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative single-site study.
PATIENTS: Ten adults with spinal muscular atrophy and two clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually or in person with participants after they completed outcome measures at a routine clinic visit. Two researchers analysed transcripts concurrently using a thematic approach to determine themes.
RESULTS: Ten themes were identified among partici-pants. Patient-reported outcome measure preference varied between functional groups and was under-responsive, although it captured meaningful data. Motor stability was most frequently expected with disease-modifying therapy, but participants also reported improved fatigue and respiratory status.
CONCLUSION: After considering patient goals, functional status, and preferences, patient-reported outcome measures represent a valuable adjunct to standard clinical and research tools. Optimal selection of patient-reported outcome measures requires careful consideration of multiple patient factors. Collaborative development of modified patient-reported outcome measures may yield a responsive, meaningful, and acceptable tool that can be used across a broad functional spectrum.