Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2020
What Is the Effect of the Ulnar-Plus Variance on the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair of the Peripheral Ulnar-Side Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kwon Bong Cheol, Lee Jeong Hwan, Lee Suk Yoon
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears between patients with and without ulnar-plus variance (UPV) and to identify factors associated with index surgery failure in these patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears from June 2014 to February 2018. We selected patients who were aged at least 18 years and underwent arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears. We excluded those with a fractured or dislocated wrist, ulnar impaction syndrome, degenerative or inflammatory arthritis of the wrist, or neurologic conditions that affect upper-extremity function, as well as those who received less than 12 months' follow-up. We evaluated the patients with a visual analog scale for pain in 3 domains (overall, with hard work, and at rest), the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, range of motion, and grip strength. Clinical outcomes and arthroscopic findings were compared between patients with and without UPV (UPV group and non-UPV group, respectively). We calculated the relative risk and 95% confidence interval for younger age (<30 years), sex, UPV, and coexisting degenerative central TFCC tear (type 2 tear) to determine the risk factors for arthroscopic repair failure.
RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups regarding visual analog scale pain and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation scores and rates of excellent or improved outcomes (P > .05). Arthroscopic repair failure was found in 4 patients. A coexisting type 2 TFCC tear was the only significant risk factor (relative risk, 49.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.94-83.96; P = .007) for arthroscopic repair failure.
CONCLUSIONS: UPV did not significantly affect the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears. However, coexisting type 2 TFCC tears significantly increased the risk of index surgery failure in these patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears from June 2014 to February 2018. We selected patients who were aged at least 18 years and underwent arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears. We excluded those with a fractured or dislocated wrist, ulnar impaction syndrome, degenerative or inflammatory arthritis of the wrist, or neurologic conditions that affect upper-extremity function, as well as those who received less than 12 months' follow-up. We evaluated the patients with a visual analog scale for pain in 3 domains (overall, with hard work, and at rest), the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, range of motion, and grip strength. Clinical outcomes and arthroscopic findings were compared between patients with and without UPV (UPV group and non-UPV group, respectively). We calculated the relative risk and 95% confidence interval for younger age (<30 years), sex, UPV, and coexisting degenerative central TFCC tear (type 2 tear) to determine the risk factors for arthroscopic repair failure.
RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups regarding visual analog scale pain and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation scores and rates of excellent or improved outcomes (P > .05). Arthroscopic repair failure was found in 4 patients. A coexisting type 2 TFCC tear was the only significant risk factor (relative risk, 49.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.94-83.96; P = .007) for arthroscopic repair failure.
CONCLUSIONS: UPV did not significantly affect the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears. However, coexisting type 2 TFCC tears significantly increased the risk of index surgery failure in these patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study.