MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2106/jbjs.17.01338

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2018

Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement: A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.

Petursson Gunnar, Fenstad Anne Marie, Gøthesen Øystein, Dyrhovden Gro Sævik, Hallan Geir, Röhrl Stephan M, Aamodt Arild, Furnes Ove

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the short-term radiographic and functional results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing computer-assisted and conventionally performed total knee replacement. We currently report the 2-year clinical results from this trial.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety patients were randomly allocated to undergo either computer-assisted or conventional total knee replacement. One hundred and seventy-two patients were available for clinical evaluation at 2 years, and 167 (97%) of those answered all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Patients and clinical evaluators were blinded to the method of surgery. Surgical outcome was assessed using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria to calculate responder rates, divided into high responders, moderate responders, and nonresponders.

RESULTS

The computer-assisted group had significantly more improvement than the conventional group in the mean scores for 2 subscales of the KOOS (7.4 for symptoms [p = 0.02] and 16.2 for sport and recreation [p < 0.01]) and in 1 subscale of the WOMAC (8.8 for stiffness [p = 0.03]).The computer-assisted group also had significantly more high responders (82.8%) than the conventional group (68.8%; p = 0.03) at 2 years, with the number needed to treat determined to be 8.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the use of computer navigation provided better pain relief and restored better function than the use of the conventional surgical technique at 2 years after total knee replacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Для цитирования: Petursson Gunnar, Fenstad Anne Marie, Gøthesen Øystein, Dyrhovden Gro Sævik, Hallan Geir, Röhrl Stephan M, Aamodt Arild, Furnes Ove. Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement: A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2018. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.01338.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.