MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s44401-025-00063-y

Медицинская библиотека · npj health systems · 2026

Uses of generative AI by non-clinician staff at an academic medical center.

Black Kameron C, Haberkorn William J, Ma Stephen P, Kiani Hanna, Bhasin Aditya, Chen Jonathan H, Shah Nigam H, Morse Keith

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Large language model (LLM) chat tools have the potential to transform healthcare workflows by improving efficiency and reducing administrative burdens. While prior research has predominantly focused on clinicians, non-clinician healthcare staff constitute the majority of the workforce, and their real-world chat tool use remains uncharacterized. This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed de-identified chat logs from a secure, HIPAA-compliant LLM chat tool deployed at an academic medical center over an 11-month period. Among 30,503 chat threads analyzed, 98% originated from non-clinician users across 239 roles. Usage was dominated by administrative tasks including email and document writing (53.9%), text manipulation (9.1%), and brainstorming (6.7%). A notable proportion of interactions included off-label queries unrelated to work or organizational goals, including 5.9% involving clinical decision-making. These findings highlight the need for targeted training, tailored governance policies, and refined evaluation frameworks to optimize appropriate LLM use while mitigating risks in healthcare settings.

Для цитирования: Black Kameron C, Haberkorn William J, Ma Stephen P, Kiani Hanna, Bhasin Aditya, Chen Jonathan H, Shah Nigam H, Morse Keith. Uses of generative AI by non-clinician staff at an academic medical center.. npj health systems. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s44401-025-00063-y.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.