Comparison of the cast and volar locking plate in the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients over 75 years of age.

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare radiologically and clinically closed reduction circular casting (CRCC) and volar locking plate (VLP) treatment options in elderly patients over 75 years with intraarticular distal radius fracture (DRF).

MATERIAL AND METHOD: Elderly patients aged ≥75 years with at least one year of follow-up from the clinic archive who underwent conservative (CRCC) and surgical (VLP) treatment for AO type C DRF were retrospectively included in the study. Thirty-seven patients treated conservatively with CRCC and 31 treated surgically with VLP were compared as two groups. Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) and Visual Analog scores (VAS) were evaluated functionally. In addition, a rapid assessment of physical activity (RAPA) score evaluation was performed since these patients were elderly. In addition, radiologic findings, wrist range of motion, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the CRCC and VLP groups regarding QDASH, VAS, and RAPA scores at the last follow up. Radiologically, there were significant differences between the groups regarding radial height, volar tilt, radial inclination and joint stepping. (respectively p= <0.001, p= <0.001, p= <0.001, p= <0.001).

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients over 75 years of age with intra-articular DRF, surgical treatment with VLP results in better radiologic results compared to conservative treatment with CRCC, although both treatment options lead to similar results in terms of functional outcomes.