[Clinical, radiological and axiographic examination after conservative functional treatment of intracapsular temporomandibular joint fractures].
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The different lines of intracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle were studied and their influence on the prognosis following close treatment was evaluated.
METHODS
In 40 patients with 50 intracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle the following evaluation was carried out after close treatment: clinical, radiological and axiographical follow-up. The examinations were performed between 0.5-5 years following treatment. Three types of intracapsular fractures were distinguished. Type A = fractures through the medial condylar pole, type B = fractures through the lateral condylar pole with loss of vertical height of mandibular ramus, type M = multiple fragments, comminuted fractures.
RESULTS
Moderate to serious dysfunction was observed in 33% of the cases. Radiological examination of fracture types B and M revealed a reduction in the height of the mandibular ramus by up to 13% as compared to the contralateral side. Also with regard to deformation of the condylar head these two fracture types resulted in the most prominent pathological findings. Axiography revealed irregular excursions and a clear limitation of condylar movement in comminuted fractures by up to 74% as compared to the non-fractured side.
CONCLUSION
The findings emphasize the severity of lesions to the osseo-disko-ligamentous complex of the TMJ caused by intracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle. The poor functional and radiological results encountered in the fracture types B and M demonstrated the limits of conservative functional treatment. With regard to fracture type B it may be discussed whether surgical therapy would improve the results.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.