Cytogenetic aberrations in perineurioma: variation with subtype.

Only two karyotypes of perineurioma have previously been reported, 46XX,del(10)(q22q24),der(10),del(22)(q11-12q?)/47, idem,+der(10) (in a sclerosing perineurioma of the finger) and 45,XX,add(14)(p13),-22,add(22)(q11.2) (in an intraneural perineurioma). We investigated the clinicopathologic and cytogenetic findings in four consecutive perineuriomas in children, including two small (< or =1 cm) digital sclerosing perineuriomas, a 2-cm intraneural perineurioma, and a 16-cm abdominal soft tissue perineurioma. All lesions showed plump perineurial cells in a complex whorled configuration. Immunohistochemical (strong EMA immunostaining in all cases) and ultrastructural (in three of three lesions examined) evidence of perineurial differentiation was present. The sclerosing perineuriomas showed 46,XY,t(2;10)(p23;q24) and 47,XX,add(3)(q23),add(6)(q21),-5,-9,-10,-22,+mar1,+mar2,+mars; the intraneural tumor showed 46,XX,add(2)(q11.2),add(3)(q12); and the abdominal soft tissue perineurioma showed 46,XX,t(8;9)(q13;q22). Metaphase FISH analysis for an ALK gene rearrangement in the sclerosing perineurioma with t(2;10) was negative; the ALK signal remained on the der(2). We conclude that perineuriomas display mostly simple karyotypes, characterized by one or few chromosomal rearrangements or numerical changes. In conjunction with the previously published sclerosing perineurioma karyotypes, the findings of chromosome 10 aberrations, t(2;10)(p23;q24) and monosomy 10 in two sclerosing perineuriomas, indicate that rearrangements and/or deletions of 10q are a consistent finding in this variant of perineurioma. The findings also expand previous assertions that chromosome 22 abnormalities are pathogenetic in perineurioma and suggest that diverse genetic tumorigenic mechanisms may exist, possibly depending on the subtype.