m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Der Unfallchirurg · 2002

[Postoperative radial paralysis. Fate or negligence, conservative wait or revision?].

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Brug E, Joist A, Meffert R

Аннотация

Radial nerve palsy is a rather frequent complication caused by an accident as well as by surgery of the humerus. As a primary, i.e., accidental lesion, its incidence as stated in the literature is up to 30%, primarily fractures in the distal diaphyseal half. Secondary, i.e., surgically induced, nerve lesions surprisingly are reported with a similar frequency, though recently the incidence only approaches some 3%. Experts continue to argue over the timing for operative revision. Many authors rely on spontaneous recovery of the nerve as maintained by L. Boehler in the early 1960s, but this theory was rendered obsolete by the technical achievements of microsurgery and the patients' economic constraints. Other authors are afraid of accidentally damaging the nerve by revision surgery. The stand we take in this controversy is instant revision surgery both for accidental lesions as well as uncompromisingly for those incurred during surgery when the surgeon had not explored the nerve far enough to preserve it during the operation. Three exemplary cases are reported, one of them submitted for an expert's opinion because of an alleged mistake on the part of the doctor. Forensic responsibility has to match actual indication principles and the specific technique applied.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты