Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2023
Patterns of stress distribution of endodontically treated molar under different types of loading using finite element models-the exploring of mechanism of vertical root fracture.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Yuefen, Hu Ziyang, Hu Yanni, Gao Antian, Pan Xiao, Tang Rong, Lin Zitong
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanism of vertical root fracture (VRF) using three-dimensional finite element models (FEMs).
METHODS: An endodontically treated mandibular first molar with a subtle VRF was collected and scanned with cone beam CT (CBCT). Three finite element analysis models were created: Model 1 had the actual endodontically treated root canal size; Model 2 had the same root canal size as the contralateral homonymous tooth; and Model 3 had the root canal size expanded by 1 mm based on Model 1. Different types of loading were performed on these 3 FEMs. The stress distribution on the cervical, middle, and apical planes was analyzed, and the maximum stress on the root canal wall was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: In Model 1, the maximum stress around the root canal wall occurred in the cervical part of the mesial root under vertical masticatory force and in the middle part of the mesial root under buccal and lingual lateral masticatory forces. Additionally, there was a stress change zone in a bucco-lingual direction that corresponded with the actual fracture line. In Model 2, the maximum stress around the root canal was in the cervical part of the mesial root under both vertical and buccal lateral masticatory forces. For Model 3, the stress distribution was similar to that of Model 1, but greater under buccal lateral masticatory force and occlusal trauma force. In all three models, the maximum stress around the root canal wall was in the middle part of the distal root under occlusal trauma force.
CONCLUSIONS: The uneven stress around the root canal in the middle part (presented as a stress change zone in a bucco-lingual direction) may be the cause of VRFs.
METHODS: An endodontically treated mandibular first molar with a subtle VRF was collected and scanned with cone beam CT (CBCT). Three finite element analysis models were created: Model 1 had the actual endodontically treated root canal size; Model 2 had the same root canal size as the contralateral homonymous tooth; and Model 3 had the root canal size expanded by 1 mm based on Model 1. Different types of loading were performed on these 3 FEMs. The stress distribution on the cervical, middle, and apical planes was analyzed, and the maximum stress on the root canal wall was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: In Model 1, the maximum stress around the root canal wall occurred in the cervical part of the mesial root under vertical masticatory force and in the middle part of the mesial root under buccal and lingual lateral masticatory forces. Additionally, there was a stress change zone in a bucco-lingual direction that corresponded with the actual fracture line. In Model 2, the maximum stress around the root canal was in the cervical part of the mesial root under both vertical and buccal lateral masticatory forces. For Model 3, the stress distribution was similar to that of Model 1, but greater under buccal lateral masticatory force and occlusal trauma force. In all three models, the maximum stress around the root canal wall was in the middle part of the distal root under occlusal trauma force.
CONCLUSIONS: The uneven stress around the root canal in the middle part (presented as a stress change zone in a bucco-lingual direction) may be the cause of VRFs.