Ugeskrift for laeger · 2002
[Pharmaco-economic evaluation of drug therapy osteoporosis. A literature review].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Christensen Palle Mark, Brøsen Kim, Brixen Kim T, Beck-Nielsen Henning, Søgaard Jes, Kristiansen Ivar Sønbø
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Interventions against osteoporosis may reduce the incidence of fractures in patients and costs to society, but they also incur additional expenditure and thus call for economic evaluation. The aim of this paper was to evaluate existing literature by applying cost-effectiveness (CEA) and cost-utility analyses (CUA) to pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and the reference lists of relevant papers were searched to identify original papers on the subject. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed, written in English or a Scandinavian language, and reported CEA or CUA for a specified pharmacological intervention.
RESULTS: Of the 37 identified studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria (ten CUA and six CEA), and 21 studies were excluded. Of the studies examined, 13 studies concerned hormone replacement therapy (HRT), four bisphosphonate, four calcitonin, and four calcium supplementation and/or vitamin D treatment. All were based on simulations of the long-term effects of the intervention with respect to cost and effect. However, the studies varied widely in patient selection and assumptions about duration and effectiveness of intervention, assessment of quality of life, and mortality following hip fracture.
DISCUSSION: The published studies rely on limited empirical data as regards the effect of treatment, costs, and adverse effects. Several, however, indicate that some interventions may be cost-effective in high-risk groups.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and the reference lists of relevant papers were searched to identify original papers on the subject. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed, written in English or a Scandinavian language, and reported CEA or CUA for a specified pharmacological intervention.
RESULTS: Of the 37 identified studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria (ten CUA and six CEA), and 21 studies were excluded. Of the studies examined, 13 studies concerned hormone replacement therapy (HRT), four bisphosphonate, four calcitonin, and four calcium supplementation and/or vitamin D treatment. All were based on simulations of the long-term effects of the intervention with respect to cost and effect. However, the studies varied widely in patient selection and assumptions about duration and effectiveness of intervention, assessment of quality of life, and mortality following hip fracture.
DISCUSSION: The published studies rely on limited empirical data as regards the effect of treatment, costs, and adverse effects. Several, however, indicate that some interventions may be cost-effective in high-risk groups.