EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
Welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW Panel), Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Canali Elisabetta, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas Jose Luis, Schmidt Christian Gortázar, Herskin Mette, Michel Virginie, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Padalino Barbara, Roberts Helen Clare, Spoolder Hans, Stahl Karl, Viltrop Arvo, Winckler Christoph, Berg Charlotte, Edwards Sandra, Knierim Ute, Riber Anja, Salamon Attila, Tiemann Inga, Fabris Chiara, Manakidou Aikaterini, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Van der Stede Yves, Vitali Marika, Velarde Antonio
Аннотация
This Scientific Opinion concerns the welfare of Domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus), Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata domesticus) and their hybrids (Mule ducks), Domestic geese (Anser anser f. domesticus) and Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) in relation to the rearing of breeders, birds for meat, Muscovy and Mule ducks and Domestic geese for foie gras and layer Japanese quail for egg production. The most common husbandry systems (HSs) in the European Union are described for each animal species and category. The following welfare consequences are described and assessed for each species: restriction of movement, injuries (bone lesions including fractures and dislocations, soft tissue lesions and integument damage and locomotory disorders including lameness), group stress, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour and inability to express maternal behaviour (related to prelaying and nesting behaviours). Animal-based measures relevant for the assessment of these welfare consequences were identified and described. The relevant hazards leading to the welfare consequences in the different HSs were identified. Specific factors such as space allowance (including minimum enclosure area and height) per bird, group size, floor quality, characteristics of nesting facilities and enrichment provided (including access to water to fulfil biological needs) were assessed in relation to the welfare consequences and, recommendations on how to prevent the welfare consequences were provided in a quantitative or qualitative way.