Australian journal of general practice · 2024
Offering reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy and fragile X syndrome: Views of Victorian general practitioners.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leibowitz Ruth, Lewis Sharon, Delatycki Martin, Massie John, Emery Jon, Archibald Alison
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Royal Australian College of General Practice recommends that all women contemplating pregnancy or in early pregnancy should be offered reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). In November 2023, a new Medicare item number was introduced for RGCS to detect cystic fibrosis (CF), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and fragile X syndrome (FXS) carrier status. The role of general practice in offering RGCS is recognised as being of crucial importance, but only a minority of general practitioners (GPs) are offering such screening. This study investigates the facilitators and barriers to offering RGCS in general practice.
METHOD: Fifteen Victorian GPs who had offered RGCS for CF, SMA and FXS participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. A behavioural change framework was used for this study.
RESULTS: Barriers to offering screening (eg out-of-pocket costs, low frequency of preconception care and lack of GP education) mapped predominantly onto the 'opportunity' domain of the behaviour change framework.
DISCUSSION: Reducing out-of-pocket costs and increasing the provision of preconception care and GP education will provide more people with the opportunity to make informed choices about participation in RGCS.
METHOD: Fifteen Victorian GPs who had offered RGCS for CF, SMA and FXS participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. A behavioural change framework was used for this study.
RESULTS: Barriers to offering screening (eg out-of-pocket costs, low frequency of preconception care and lack of GP education) mapped predominantly onto the 'opportunity' domain of the behaviour change framework.
DISCUSSION: Reducing out-of-pocket costs and increasing the provision of preconception care and GP education will provide more people with the opportunity to make informed choices about participation in RGCS.