Pulse-train versus single-pulse t-EMG stimulation for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the PTS method in neuromonitoring of thoracic pedicle screws in a young cohort of AIS patients. The accuracy of both PTS (Pulse-train stimulation) and SPS (Single-pulse stimulation) techniques in the detection of misplaced thoracic screws was compared with special reference to the screws placed at the concavity and the convexity of the curve.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A single-center prospective clinical cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: Twelve AIS patients who underwent elective surgery were included in this study. Screw stimulation using repetitive constant-current stimulus train of variable intensities was first performed after screw insertion. SPS was performed immediately after PTS. Postoperatively, CT scan was used to check the final position of the screws. A total of 246 thoracic pedicle screws were placed. Thresholds of screws placed in the convexity and the concavity were compared.

RESULTS

Invasion of the spinal canal was postoperatively confirmed in 29 of the pedicle screws. The SPS technique detected three (10.3%) of these screws using a threshold limit of 12 mA. The PTS technique detected 25 (86.2%) of the 29 misplaced screws using threshold of 30 mA (negative predictive value, 93.1%). When using a PTS threshold of < 20 mA, the positive predictive value was 70%. SPS did not detect any of the misplaced screws at the apex level of the scoliotic curves, and PTS detected 10 out of 17 of these screws. Overall, area under the ROC curve was 0.82 for PTS and 0.61 for SPS.

CONCLUSIONS

PTS is a reliable method for detecting medially misplaced screws among young AIS patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. PTS provides more accurate predictions than SPS and improves the identification of screws invading the spinal canal at the apex or near the apex levels.