DOI 10.1097/bot.0000000000001756
Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Versus Titanium Tibial Intramedullary Nailing: A Preliminary Analysis and Results.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Standard titanium nails (TN) or carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK nails (CFN) were compared to evaluate impact of material on fracture union, healing time, knee/ankle, and barometric pain.
DESIGN
Longitudinal cohort evaluated retrospectively comparing 2 periods using 2 implant types.
SETTING
Single surgeon series at one Level II Trauma Center.
PATIENTS: Standardized treatment protocol. Fifty-six tibial fracture patients suitable for intramedullary nailing over 5-year period.
INTERVENTION: First period-TN; second period-CFN.
MAIN OUTCOME: Measurements: standard demographic data: OTA/AO fracture classification, fracture location, and nail type.
OUTCOME PARAMETERS: cumulative healing at standard time intervals, infection/nonunion, associated injuries, knee/ankle, barometric pain, and implant removal. Statistical analysis comparing incident healing.
RESULTS
Patient populations were not statistically different regarding demographics and fracture type/location, although there was a trend toward greater fracture severity/more associated injuries in CFN group. In 56 patients, 26 received CFN and 30 received TN. Healing rates were reported at each time interval. 8 weeks: TN-0%, CFN-19%; 12 weeks: TN-17%, CFN-69%; 16 weeks: TN-57%, CFN-92%; 20 weeks: TN-87%, CFN-96%; and 24 weeks: TN-97%, CFN-96% (P < 0.0001 every interval except 24 weeks). Each group had one infected nonunion in an open fracture that healed with subsequent treatment. There was a trend toward less barometric pain with CFN that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.065). No statistical differences with knee/ankle pain (P = 0.109)/removal of implant (P = 0.269) potentially due to low power of pilot study.
CONCLUSIONS
In this pilot study evaluating CFR-PEEK intramedullary nail for tibial shaft fractures, there was a demonstrated accelerated healing times compared to titanium with a potential for less barometric pain.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.