Determining the necessity for right heart catheterization in pulmonary hypertension associated with connective tissue diseases assessed by echocardiography.
Аннотация
AIM: The prognosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in systemic sclerosis (SSC) and in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is different. According to the guidelines, right heart catheterization (RHC) is necessary in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD). However, there is little supporting evidence. Therefore, we attempted to determine the necessity for RHC and the causes of differences in prognosis of PH by comparing SSC to SLE.
METHODS
The inclusion criteria were all patients with SSC or SLE with exertional dyspnea. Echocardiography and carotid Doppler ultrasound were performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-three patients with SSC and 23 with SLE participated in this study. There was no difference in the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) between SSC and SLE (33.0 mmHg, range 25.3-41.7 mmHg vs. 32.4 mmHg, range 27.0-37.7 mmHg; P = 0.835). In multiple linear regression analysis, the ratio of peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity to right ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral, which represents pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), was correlated with RVSP in SSC (r(2) = 0.928, β = 0.362, P = 0.003), and the independent predictor of increased RVSP was the ratio of early diastolic transmitral filling velocity to early diastolic septal mitral annular velocity, which represents diastolic dysfunction in SLE (R(2) = 0.806, β = 0.803, P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS
PVR was an important cause of PH in SSC. Left ventricular dysfunction was an important cause of PH in SLE. Thus, these findings demonstrate the necessity for RHC and differences in prognosis of PH in CTD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.