MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bdra.20653

Медицинская библиотека · Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2010

Co-occurrence of achondroplasia and Down syndrome: Genotype/phenotype association.

de Azevedo Moreira Lilia Maria, Matos Marcos A, Schiper Patricia P, Carvalho Acácia F L, Gomes Ivalda C, Rolemberg José C, Ferreira de Lima Renata L L, Toralles Maria B P

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This report describes the sixth case of an unusual association: Down syndrome with achondroplasia. It also analyzes the effects of both of these disorders on patient phenotype.

METHODS

A male infant was evaluated for Down syndrome. His appearance also suggested a diagnosis of achondroplasia. The child was evaluated by physical examination, radiography, cytogenetic study, and mutation analysis.

RESULTS

Chromosome analysis showed a karyotype of 47,XY,+21 in all 30 cells analyzed. Radiographic examination showed typical findings of achondroplasia, such as disproportionately large skull, shortening of limb segments, and lumbar lordosis. FGFR3 screening showed a heterozygous G1138A mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The interaction of these two distinct genetic disorders in the same patient produces a phenotype typical of each syndrome with some overlapping signs. This case represents de novo origin of two disorders that both may be parental-age related.

Для цитирования: de Azevedo Moreira Lilia Maria, Matos Marcos A, Schiper Patricia P, Carvalho Acácia F L, Gomes Ivalda C, Rolemberg José C, Ferreira de Lima Renata L L, Toralles Maria B P. Co-occurrence of achondroplasia and Down syndrome: Genotype/phenotype association.. Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20653.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.