Visual Field and Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters With and Without Positive Family History of Glaucoma.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Complex thickness using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography with and without positive family history of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and its relation to visual field.
METHODS
Total 120 eyes with each subjects with positive family history of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (Group I, n=30) and healthy subjects without positive family history of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (Group II, n=30) undergone complete ophthalmic evaluation with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, Ganglion Cell Complex and VF obtained from Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography RTVue-100 and Humphrey visual field respectively .The measurements were analyzed and compared among two groups using independent-t test by using SPSS version 23.The relationship of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer with visual field were evaluated with correlation analysis.
RESULTS
There were 75 patients included in the study.nasal, temporal RNFL and average Ganglion Cell Complex was significantly lower and thinner in Group I with mean difference of -8.53±2.30 µm (p<0.001), -7.35±3.34 µm (p<0.001), -8.52±3.58µm (p<0.001),-11.87±2.24µm (p<0.001), -5.31±1.95µm (p<0.001) and -8.05±1.52µm (p<0.001) respectively. Correlation plot with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer thickness as predictor of Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation indicated statistically significant degree of determination in Group I (r=0.455 and r=0.623, p<0.001 and p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The Optical Coherence Tomography and visual field Parameters are lower in group I and used as an early predictor, diagnosis, monitoring and management.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.