The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2023
One-piece endodontic crown fixed partial denture: Is it possible?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tribst João Paulo M, Dal Piva Amanda Maria de O, Muris Joris, Kleverlaan Cornelis J, Feilzer Albert J
Аннотация
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Whether the replacement of a missing tooth with a fixed partial denture supported by an endodontically treated abutment could be improved with 1-piece endodontic crowns is unclear.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of a fixed partial denture (FPD) according to the preparation of the abutment teeth (1-piece endodontic crown or complete crown) in terms of stress magnitude in the prosthesis, cement layer, and tooth.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A posterior model with 2 abutment teeth (first molar and first premolar) was modeled with a computer-aided design (CAD) software program for conducting a 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). To replace the missing second premolar, the model was replicated in different possible FPDs according to the abutment preparation design (complete crown [Conventional], 2 1-piece endodontic crowns [EC]) or a 1-piece endodontic crown on one of the abutment teeth (first molar [ECM] and first premolar [ECP]) for a total of 4 designs. All FPDs were in lithium disilicate. The solids were imported to an analysis software program (ANSYS 19.2) in the standard for the exchange of product data (STEP) format. The mechanical properties were considered isotropic and the materials to show linear elastic and homogeneous behavior. An axial load (300 N) was applied at the occlusal surface of the pontic. The results were evaluated by colorimetric stress maps of von Mises and maximum principal stress in the prosthesis, maximum principal stress and shear stresses on the cement layer, and maximum principal stress in the abutment teeth.
RESULTS: The von Mises stresses revealed that all FPD designs behaved similarly and that, considering the maximum principal stress criteria, the pontic was the most stressed region. For the cement layer, the combined designs presented an intermediate behavior, with the ECM more suitable to reducing the stress peak. The conventional preparation allowed less stress concentration in both teeth, and higher stress concentration in the premolar was observed with a 1-piece endodontic crown. The 1-piece endodontic crown decreased the risk of fracture failure. Considering the risk of debonding failure for the prosthesis, the 1-piece endodontic crown preparation was only able to decrease the failure risk when the EC design was used and when only the shear stress was considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing 1-piece endodontic crown preparations to retain a 3-unit lithium disilicate FPD is an alternative to conventional complete crown preparations.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of a fixed partial denture (FPD) according to the preparation of the abutment teeth (1-piece endodontic crown or complete crown) in terms of stress magnitude in the prosthesis, cement layer, and tooth.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A posterior model with 2 abutment teeth (first molar and first premolar) was modeled with a computer-aided design (CAD) software program for conducting a 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). To replace the missing second premolar, the model was replicated in different possible FPDs according to the abutment preparation design (complete crown [Conventional], 2 1-piece endodontic crowns [EC]) or a 1-piece endodontic crown on one of the abutment teeth (first molar [ECM] and first premolar [ECP]) for a total of 4 designs. All FPDs were in lithium disilicate. The solids were imported to an analysis software program (ANSYS 19.2) in the standard for the exchange of product data (STEP) format. The mechanical properties were considered isotropic and the materials to show linear elastic and homogeneous behavior. An axial load (300 N) was applied at the occlusal surface of the pontic. The results were evaluated by colorimetric stress maps of von Mises and maximum principal stress in the prosthesis, maximum principal stress and shear stresses on the cement layer, and maximum principal stress in the abutment teeth.
RESULTS: The von Mises stresses revealed that all FPD designs behaved similarly and that, considering the maximum principal stress criteria, the pontic was the most stressed region. For the cement layer, the combined designs presented an intermediate behavior, with the ECM more suitable to reducing the stress peak. The conventional preparation allowed less stress concentration in both teeth, and higher stress concentration in the premolar was observed with a 1-piece endodontic crown. The 1-piece endodontic crown decreased the risk of fracture failure. Considering the risk of debonding failure for the prosthesis, the 1-piece endodontic crown preparation was only able to decrease the failure risk when the EC design was used and when only the shear stress was considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing 1-piece endodontic crown preparations to retain a 3-unit lithium disilicate FPD is an alternative to conventional complete crown preparations.