Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 1999
Comparison of biochemical markers of bone remodelling in the assessment of the effects of alendronate on bone in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stĕpán J J, Vokrouhlická J
Аннотация
The effects of alendronate treatment on biochemical markers of bone remodelling and bone mineral density (BMD) were studied in 30 Caucasian women (postmenopausal for at least 3 years, age 42-76 years, with BMD of the lumbar spine at least 2 S.D. below the mean for mature, premenopausal women). The patients were randomly assigned to receive alendronate (10 mg/day) or placebo for 12 months (double blind). The study was subsequently extended to a second year of open alendronate treatment. The treatment with alendronate resulted in a significant and progressive increase in BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Under the treatment, the maximal decrease of biochemical markers of bone remodelling (osteocalcin in plasma, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen in serum, and cross-linked amino-terminal N-telopeptide and total hydroxyproline in urine) was observed at 6 months with no further change during the 2-year period. There were no significant differences in discriminating between patients treated for 1 year with alendronate or placebo using either the percentage change in spine BMD at month 12, or a single measurement of the marker at month 6, or log (percent of baseline at month 6 of value of the marker). In this respect, the power of all the biochemical markers were comparable. The markers are a valuable adjunct to the measurements of BMD, especially in the patients not showing an increase of 3% or more at the lumbar spine BMD after 1 year of treatment.