PloS one · 2024
Impact of pyrazinamide usage on serious adverse events in elderly tuberculosis patients: A multicenter cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoon Joon Young, Kim Tae-Ok, Kim Ju Sang, Kim Hyung Woo, Lee Eung Gu, Jung Sung Soo, Oh Jee Youn, Kim Jin Woo, Lee Sang Haak, Kim Seunghoon, Kim Sun-Hyung, Park Yeonhee, Min Jinsoo, Kwon Yong-Soo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pyrazinamide (PZA) usage has been associated with adverse drug reactions, prompting its avoidance in treating elderly tuberculosis (TB) patients. This study aims to examine whether the administration of PZA is associated with poor outcomes during TB treatment among elderly individuals.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken on data collected from a prospective cohort conducted between July 2019 and June 2023, which involved tuberculosis patients from 18 institutions across the Republic of Korea. The study aimed to assess the impact of PZA on the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), medication interruptions, and becoming loss to follow-up (LTFU) during standard short courses of TB treatment in elderly (≥65 years old) patients.
RESULTS: PZA was administered to 356 of 390 elderly patients (91.3%), and 98 of the 390 (25.1%) experienced SAEs. Treatment success was significantly lower in patients not treated with PZA compared to those who received PZA (64.7% vs 89.9%, p < 0.001). The incidence of SAEs, medication interruption, or LTFU was higher in patients not given PZA compared those who received PZA (52.9% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.002). A multivariate logistic regression analysis, factoring in covariates such as age, comorbidities, and baseline laboratory data, revealed that PZA was not a risk factor for SAEs, medication interruption, or LTFU in TB treatment (odds ratio [OR] 0.457, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.201-1.041).
CONCLUSION: Treating elderly TB patients with PZA did not increase the incidence of SAEs, medication interruptions, or LTFU during the standard short course of TB treatment. Therefore, considering its potential advantages, incorporating PZA into the treatment regimen for elderly TB patients may be advisable.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken on data collected from a prospective cohort conducted between July 2019 and June 2023, which involved tuberculosis patients from 18 institutions across the Republic of Korea. The study aimed to assess the impact of PZA on the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), medication interruptions, and becoming loss to follow-up (LTFU) during standard short courses of TB treatment in elderly (≥65 years old) patients.
RESULTS: PZA was administered to 356 of 390 elderly patients (91.3%), and 98 of the 390 (25.1%) experienced SAEs. Treatment success was significantly lower in patients not treated with PZA compared to those who received PZA (64.7% vs 89.9%, p < 0.001). The incidence of SAEs, medication interruption, or LTFU was higher in patients not given PZA compared those who received PZA (52.9% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.002). A multivariate logistic regression analysis, factoring in covariates such as age, comorbidities, and baseline laboratory data, revealed that PZA was not a risk factor for SAEs, medication interruption, or LTFU in TB treatment (odds ratio [OR] 0.457, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.201-1.041).
CONCLUSION: Treating elderly TB patients with PZA did not increase the incidence of SAEs, medication interruptions, or LTFU during the standard short course of TB treatment. Therefore, considering its potential advantages, incorporating PZA into the treatment regimen for elderly TB patients may be advisable.