Evaluation of internal fixation techniques for extracapsular fracture: A finite element analysis and comparison.

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

This study explored the optimal plates and screws fixation for extracapsular fracture by finite element analysis, and provided a biomechanical basis for clinical treatment.

METHODS

Four extracapsular fixation models were built and evaluated: A. One single straight four-hole plate with two bi-cortical screws on both sides and two mono-cortical screws in the middle; B. One single straight four-hole plate with four bi-cortical screws; C. Two straight four-hole plates, each with two bi-cortical screws on both sides and two mono-cortical screws in the middle; D. One L-shape four-hole plate in the back and one straight four-hole plate in the front, each with two bi-cortical screws on both sides and two mono-cortical screws in the middle. Displacements of fractured bone blocks and stress of plates, screws, cortical and cancellous bone and the deformation of plates were analyzed by finite element analysis to investigate their stability in clinical using.

RESULTS

Groups A and B showed larger displacements of the fractured bone block, greater deformation of plates and higher risk of the plate breakage during masticatory motion. Groups C and D exhibited the minimum displacements of the fractured bone block, the stress distribution within the safe range and less deformation of the plates. In addition, double plates fixation and bi-cortical screws exceeded single plate fixation and mono-cortical screws in stability, respectively, while an L-shape plate exhibited no significant differences in the stress dispersion and the displacement reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Double plates fixation of the extracapsular condylar fracture was a safe and stable way and bi-cortical screws should be selected as far as possible.