DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2025.112772
Association between the appendicular skeletal muscle mass-to-visceral fat area ratio and bone mineral density and osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This cross-sectional study investigated the association between appendicular skeletal muscle mass-to-visceral fat area ratio (SVR), bone mineral density (BMD), and osteoporosis in U.S. adults using NHANES data.
METHODS
Data from the 2013-2014 and 2017-2018 NHANES cycles were analyzed. Multivariable regression models assessed associations between SVR, BMD, and osteoporosis, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, metabolic, and comorbidity variables. Generalized Additive Models with smooth curve fitting and likelihood ratio tests evaluated model fit. Subgroup analyses explored effect modifications.
RESULTS
The study included 2325 individuals with a mean age of 50.66 ± 5.55 years. In fully adjusted models, the highest SVR tertile was associated with a 0.05 g/cm2 higher BMD (β = 0.05, 95 % CI: 0.03-0.08, P = 0.002) and 57 % lower odds of osteoporosis (OR = 0.43, 95 % CI: 0.24-0.78, P = 0.028) than the lowest tertile. As a continuous variable, SVR remained significantly associated with BMD (β = 0.03, 95 % CI: 0.02-0.04, P = 0.002) and osteoporosis (OR = 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.50-0.91, P = 0.033). Stronger associations were found in individuals with diabetes (β = 0.09, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.12, P < 0.01) and BMI ≥ 30 (β = 0.07, 95 % CI: 0.05-0.09, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Higher SVR was significantly associated with increased BMD and lower odds of osteoporosis, suggesting its potential as a marker for bone health assessment. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Further longitudinal and mechanistic studies are warranted to confirm these findings and explore clinical applicability.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.