DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103909
In silico evaluation of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel stent in a patient-specific coronary artery.
Аннотация
Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging method for the fabrication of stents, which is cost-saving and capable of producing personalised stent designs. However, poor surface finish and dimension discrepancy in the manufactured stents can significantly affect not only their own mechanical behavior but also mechanical response of arteries. This study investigates the effects of surface irregularities and dimension discrepancy of a 316L stainless steel stent, manufactured using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), on its biomechanical performance, in comparison with the original design and a commercial stent. In silico simulations of stent deployment in a patient-specific coronary artery, based on intravital optical coherency tomography imaging, are conducted to assess the stent deformation as well as arterial stress and damage. Severe plastic strain concentrations (with a maximum value of 1.93) occur in the LPBF stent after deployment due to surface irregularities, suggesting a high risk of stent fracture. The LPBF stent is harder to expand due to its thicker struts and closed-cell design (diameter of 4.14 mm at the peak inflating pressure during deployment, compared to 4.58 mm and 4.65 mm for the designed and MULTI-LINK RX ULTRA stents, respectively). Also, the LPBF stent induces a higher level of stress concentration (with a maximum value of 23.04 MPa) to the arterial layers, suggesting a higher risk of tissue damage and in-stent restenosis. This study demonstrates a clear need for further development of the AM process for manufacturing medical implants, especially the surface finish and dimension accuracy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.