MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.009

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics · 2006

Reliability of a clinical test for deep cervical flexor endurance.

Olson Lee E, Millar A Lynn, Dunker Jeremy, Hicks Jennifer, Glanz Devin

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Endurance deficiencies of the deep cervical flexors are associated with pain, increased lordosis, and headache. A need exists for reliable clinical tests of flexor endurance. This study determined intrarater and interrater reliability of such a test in persons without neck pain.

METHODS

Twenty-seven subjects (aged 20-35 years) without a history of neck pain or injury were tested. Supine subjects were timed in maintaining a position involving two components: (1) craniovertebral flexion (chin tuck) and (2) lower cervical flexion (holding the occiput at a fixed height). Each subject was examined twice by 3 different examiners with 1 to 2 days between trials.

RESULTS

When two values were averaged, interrater reliability for the 3 testers was 0.83, 0.85, and 0.88. Intrarater reliability values were 0.78 and 0.85 for tests 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain.

Для цитирования: Olson Lee E, Millar A Lynn, Dunker Jeremy, Hicks Jennifer, Glanz Devin. Reliability of a clinical test for deep cervical flexor endurance.. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.