Public health · 2026
Tackling trauma as a public health crisis: A roadmap towards trauma-informed, adaptive systems.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Angeli Federica, Irving Emmerline
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Trauma-spanning adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as well as relational, structural, and collective adversity-is a major driver of health inequity worldwide, with consequences extending from poor mental health to cardiovascular disease, cancer, obesity, educational underachievement, and criminal justice involvement. Despite two decades of developments in trauma-informed care (TIC) theory and practice, implementation remains fragmented and largely confined to clinical contexts. This commentary argues for a paradigm shift from individual clinical sensitivity to whole-system transformation, recognising both the structural determinants of trauma and the systemic barriers to scaled implementation and effectiveness.
STUDY DESIGN: Critical narrative synthesis and embedded regional case study.
METHODS: We synthesised peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and grey literature published up to 2025. Evidence was organised thematically around conceptual debates, the evidence base, structural barriers, and frameworks for change. The West Yorkshire Adversity, Trauma, and Resilience (ATR) Programme is illustrated as an embedded case study.
RESULTS: We identify five structural barriers to system-wide adoption: fragmented governance; undertrained workforces; insufficient cross-sector integration; inadequate evaluation infrastructure; and unsustainable financing. We propose a five-pillar framework and a phased, complexity-driven roadmap addressing each barrier. The ATR Programme in West Yorkshire, England, illustrates operationalisation at regional scale, engaging over 700 leaders and 4000 trained staff, and embedding trauma-informed principles in communities and across sectors over six years.
CONCLUSIONS: Scaling trauma-informed practice requires cultural change, governance reform, cross-sector integration, robust evaluation, and sustained financing. The cost of inaction is measured in deepening inequity and preventable harm.
STUDY DESIGN: Critical narrative synthesis and embedded regional case study.
METHODS: We synthesised peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and grey literature published up to 2025. Evidence was organised thematically around conceptual debates, the evidence base, structural barriers, and frameworks for change. The West Yorkshire Adversity, Trauma, and Resilience (ATR) Programme is illustrated as an embedded case study.
RESULTS: We identify five structural barriers to system-wide adoption: fragmented governance; undertrained workforces; insufficient cross-sector integration; inadequate evaluation infrastructure; and unsustainable financing. We propose a five-pillar framework and a phased, complexity-driven roadmap addressing each barrier. The ATR Programme in West Yorkshire, England, illustrates operationalisation at regional scale, engaging over 700 leaders and 4000 trained staff, and embedding trauma-informed principles in communities and across sectors over six years.
CONCLUSIONS: Scaling trauma-informed practice requires cultural change, governance reform, cross-sector integration, robust evaluation, and sustained financing. The cost of inaction is measured in deepening inequity and preventable harm.