[Not Available].

The present study aimed to perform two different heat-treatments in an austenitic NiTi ProFile instrument and to compare the mechanical performance of original and heat-treated instruments. Heat treatment of ProFile (tip size 25 and 0.06 taper) instruments were carried out in a furnace in argon atmosphere using a heating rate of 10° C/min. After reaching the programmed temperatures of 450 ºC or 500 ºC the system remained at a constant temperature for 10 minutes; followed by cooling in water at room temperature. Afterwards; the three groups (n=30 per group) of instruments were compared regarding their cyclic fatigue (n=10 per group); bending (n=10 per group); and buckling resistance (n=10 per group). After cyclic fatigue tests; a scanning electron microscope was used to analyze the fracture surfaces and observe the fracture mode. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test; with an alpha type error set at 0.05. Yellowish and blueish coloration was observed in the ProFile instruments after 450 ºC or 500 ºC heat treatments; respectively. Conventional ProFile instruments showed the lower cyclic fatigue; and the higher bending and buckling resistance (P<0.05). In contrast; yellowish ProFile instruments (heat treated at 500° C) showed the higher cyclic fatigue; and the lower bending and buckling resistance (P>0.05). It can be concluded that the different heat treatments performed on ProFile instruments increased its cyclic fatigue resistance and improved the flexibility and buckling resistance.