Journal of dentistry · 2022
Fractographic analysis of 35 clinically fractured bi-layered and monolithic zirconia crowns.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Skjold Anneli, Schriwer Christian, Gjerdet Nils Roar, Øilo Marit
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrieval study was to analyze the fracture features and identify the fracture origin of zirconia-based single crowns that failed during clinical use.
METHODS: Thirty-five fractured single crowns were retrieved from dental practices (bi-layered, n = 15; monolithic, n = 20). These were analyzed according to fractographic procedures by optical and scanning electron microscopy to identify fracture patterns and fracture origins. The fracture origins were closely examined. The crown margin thickness and axial wall height were measured.
RESULTS: Three types of failure modes were observed: total fractures, marginal semilunar fractures, and incisal chippings. Most of the crowns (23) had fracture origins at the crown margin and seven of them had defects in the fracture origin area. The exact fracture origin was not possible to identify due to missing parts in four crowns. The crown wall thickness was 20% thinner and wall height 30% shorter in the fracture origin area compared to the opposite side.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study show that fractography can reveal fracture origins and fracture modes of both monolithic and bi-layered dental zirconia. The findings indicate that the crown margin on the shortest axial wall is the most common fracture origin site.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Crown design factors such as material thickness at the margin, axial wall height and preparation type affects the risk of fracture. It is important to ensure that the crown margins are even and flawless.
METHODS: Thirty-five fractured single crowns were retrieved from dental practices (bi-layered, n = 15; monolithic, n = 20). These were analyzed according to fractographic procedures by optical and scanning electron microscopy to identify fracture patterns and fracture origins. The fracture origins were closely examined. The crown margin thickness and axial wall height were measured.
RESULTS: Three types of failure modes were observed: total fractures, marginal semilunar fractures, and incisal chippings. Most of the crowns (23) had fracture origins at the crown margin and seven of them had defects in the fracture origin area. The exact fracture origin was not possible to identify due to missing parts in four crowns. The crown wall thickness was 20% thinner and wall height 30% shorter in the fracture origin area compared to the opposite side.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study show that fractography can reveal fracture origins and fracture modes of both monolithic and bi-layered dental zirconia. The findings indicate that the crown margin on the shortest axial wall is the most common fracture origin site.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Crown design factors such as material thickness at the margin, axial wall height and preparation type affects the risk of fracture. It is important to ensure that the crown margins are even and flawless.