DOI 10.1097/ijg.0000000000002347
The Assessment of Radial Peripapillary Capillary Vessel Density in Adult Children of Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Аннотация
PRÉCIS: The observed decrease in radial peripapillary capillary vessel density among adult children of individuals with primary open angle glaucoma, in comparison to controls, suggests the possibility of early microvascular alterations in the eyes of these at-risk individuals.
PURPOSE: To compare the radial peripapillary capillary vessel density (RPCVD) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness values of eyes between healthy adults with a maternal or paternal history of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and age-matched healthy controls without a family history of POAG.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
RPCVD values and RNFL thicknesses in the peripapillary region and 4 quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal) were evaluated using optical coherence tomography angiography among 30 adult children of patients with POAG and 30 age-matched healthy controls without a family history of POAG.
RESULTS
The mean whole image RPCVD (51.6±1.7% vs. 49.8±1.7%, P =0.0006) and average RPCVD (54.7±1.7% vs. 53.2±2.1%, P =0.006) values were significantly lower in the adult children of patients with POAG compared with age-matched healthy controls without a family history of POAG. There was no difference in terms of RNFL thickness values in any region.
CONCLUSION
Despite having similar RNFL thickness values to the control group, the observation of lower RPCVD in the eyes of adult children of POAG patients may indicate potential early vascular alterations. The result of the present study encourages further longitudinal studies to determine the potential importance of the underlying vascular alterations in these high-risk individuals.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.