MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13018-018-0887-x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018

A novel ultrasound scanning approach for evaluating femoral cartilage defects of the knee: comparison with routine magnetic resonance imaging.

Cao Junyan, Zheng Bowen, Meng Xiaochun, Lv Yan, Lu Huading, Wang Kun, Huang Dongmei, Ren Jie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess a novel ultrasound (US) scanning approach in evaluating knee femoral cartilaginous defects, compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, commonly used for knee imaging) and arthroscopy (gold standard).

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients (65 knees) were prospectively evaluated between April 2010 and July 2011.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity (62.2 and 69.4%), specificity (92.9 and 90.5%), accuracy (75.4 and 78.5%), and adjusted positive (88.7 and 90.4%) and negative predictive (69.5 and 73.3%) were similar for both radiologists (weighted κ = 0.76). Furthermore, agreement between grading by US and MRI was substantial (weighted κ = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the novel US scanning approach allows similar diagnostic performance compared to routine MRI for knee cartilage defects. US is more accessible, easier to perform, and less expensive than MRI, with potential advantages of easier initial screening and assessment of cartilage defects.

Для цитирования: Cao Junyan, Zheng Bowen, Meng Xiaochun, Lv Yan, Lu Huading, Wang Kun, Huang Dongmei, Ren Jie. A novel ultrasound scanning approach for evaluating femoral cartilage defects of the knee: comparison with routine magnetic resonance imaging.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0887-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.