Mid-to-long term follow-up of Transcend metal-on-metal versus Interseal metal-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty.

Second-generation metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) was introduced in the early 1990s to address osteolysis and aseptic loosening resulting from polyethylene wear. We present a comparison between the Transcend metal-on-metal and Interseal metal-on-polyethylene THAs. Thirty-seven hips with Transcend metal bearings and 36 hips with Interseal polyethylene acetabular liners but identical acetabular shells were reviewed to determine clinical performance, radiographic changes, and survivorship. Patients with higher anticipated activity levels were selected to receive the Transcend bearing. Mean follow-up time was 107.0 months for the Transcend group, and 90.4 months for the Interseal group. There were no significant differences between the Transcend and Interseal groups for mode of failure and survivorship, which is notable considering the younger and more active Transcend group. However, the Transcend group showed significantly better clinical scores, which may have been a result of the selection methods. Neither surface was differentially implicated in osteolysis, aseptic loosening, or adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR). Our study shows a favorable and comparable performance for both systems.