Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2022
Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giordano Matthew C, Corona Katia, Morris Brent J, Mocini Fabrizio, Saturnino Luca, Cerciello Simone
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lateralized onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is designed to ensure better clinical functional recovery and lower rate of complications compared with Grammont medialized inlay RSA. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between these 2 different designs.
METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent RSA were retrospectively analyzed. Nine patients were lost to follow-up, 34 received a curved onlay with a 145° neck-shaft angle (Ascend Flex group), and 42 received a long straight inlay stem with a 155° neck-shaft angle (Delta Xtend group). Patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 46.8 ± 13.2 months (Ascend Flex group) and 36 ± 10.8 months (Delta Xtend group). Clinical outcome measures included active range of motion, strength, visual analog scale, Constant-Murley score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Radiographic evaluation at the final follow-up was performed to assess scapular notching, stress shielding, acromial or scapular fractures, heterotopic ossification, and radiolucent lines or implant loosening.
RESULTS: No differences emerged between the 2 groups in terms of visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores, pain, function, strength, mobility, active forward elevation, active internal rotation, active external rotation at 0° and 90° of abduction, abduction, forward elevation, and external rotation strength (P = n.s.). Statistically superior active abduction was observed in the Delta Xtend group (P = .0017). Scapular notching was observed in 12 shoulders (35.2%) in the Ascend Flex group (a grade 1) and in 10 shoulders (23.8%) in the Delta Xtend group (P = n.s.). No differences emerged between the 2 groups in terms of humeral or glenoid radiolucency (P = n.s.). Higher rate of humeral stress shielding rate was observed in the Ascend flex cohort (P = n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference emerged between the 145° onlay curved stem vs. the 155° inlay straight stem according to most of the evaluated parameters. Statistically superior active abduction was observed in the 155° group although it did not affect patients' satisfaction.
METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients who underwent RSA were retrospectively analyzed. Nine patients were lost to follow-up, 34 received a curved onlay with a 145° neck-shaft angle (Ascend Flex group), and 42 received a long straight inlay stem with a 155° neck-shaft angle (Delta Xtend group). Patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 46.8 ± 13.2 months (Ascend Flex group) and 36 ± 10.8 months (Delta Xtend group). Clinical outcome measures included active range of motion, strength, visual analog scale, Constant-Murley score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Radiographic evaluation at the final follow-up was performed to assess scapular notching, stress shielding, acromial or scapular fractures, heterotopic ossification, and radiolucent lines or implant loosening.
RESULTS: No differences emerged between the 2 groups in terms of visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores, pain, function, strength, mobility, active forward elevation, active internal rotation, active external rotation at 0° and 90° of abduction, abduction, forward elevation, and external rotation strength (P = n.s.). Statistically superior active abduction was observed in the Delta Xtend group (P = .0017). Scapular notching was observed in 12 shoulders (35.2%) in the Ascend Flex group (a grade 1) and in 10 shoulders (23.8%) in the Delta Xtend group (P = n.s.). No differences emerged between the 2 groups in terms of humeral or glenoid radiolucency (P = n.s.). Higher rate of humeral stress shielding rate was observed in the Ascend flex cohort (P = n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference emerged between the 145° onlay curved stem vs. the 155° inlay straight stem according to most of the evaluated parameters. Statistically superior active abduction was observed in the 155° group although it did not affect patients' satisfaction.