Medicine · 2022
Biomechanical comparison between double-plate fixation and posterior plate fixation for comminuted olecranon fracture using two triceps screws in synthetic bone model.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Yohan, Cho Bong Wan, Kim Min Bom, Lee Young Ho
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although preventing triceps fragment displacement is essential for treating an olecranon fracture, we frequently encounter situations in which only a few screws can be fixed to the triceps fragment. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of double-plate fixation and posterior plate fixation for olecranon fractures when the triceps fragment was small and only 2 screws could be inserted.
METHODS: A composite ulna model was used to simulate olecranon fracture. Four groups were formed consisting of double-plate and posterior plates with cortical and locking screws. The cyclic loading test was conducted for 500 cyclic loads of 5 to 50 N on a specimen to measure micromotion and displacement of the gap caused by light exercise. The load-to-failure test was performed by applying a load until fixation loss, defined as when the fracture gap increased by 2 mm or more or catastrophic failure occurred, to measure the maximum load.
RESULTS: Eight samples per group were tested through the pilot study. All groups were stable with a micromotion of <0.5 mm. However, the mean micromotion showed significant differences between the 4 groups (P < .001, Table 1). In the mean micromotion during exercise, posterior plating with cortical screws was the most stable (0.09 ± 0.02 mm) while double-plating with cortical screws was the most unstable (0.42 ± 0.11 mm). At the maximum load, posterior plating with locking screws was the strongest (205.3 ± 2.8 N) while double-plating with cortical screws was the weakest (143.3 ± 27.1 N). There was no significant difference in displacement after light exercise between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that when 2 triceps screws were used, both groups were stable during light exercise, but posterior-plating was stronger than double-plating.
METHODS: A composite ulna model was used to simulate olecranon fracture. Four groups were formed consisting of double-plate and posterior plates with cortical and locking screws. The cyclic loading test was conducted for 500 cyclic loads of 5 to 50 N on a specimen to measure micromotion and displacement of the gap caused by light exercise. The load-to-failure test was performed by applying a load until fixation loss, defined as when the fracture gap increased by 2 mm or more or catastrophic failure occurred, to measure the maximum load.
RESULTS: Eight samples per group were tested through the pilot study. All groups were stable with a micromotion of <0.5 mm. However, the mean micromotion showed significant differences between the 4 groups (P < .001, Table 1). In the mean micromotion during exercise, posterior plating with cortical screws was the most stable (0.09 ± 0.02 mm) while double-plating with cortical screws was the most unstable (0.42 ± 0.11 mm). At the maximum load, posterior plating with locking screws was the strongest (205.3 ± 2.8 N) while double-plating with cortical screws was the weakest (143.3 ± 27.1 N). There was no significant difference in displacement after light exercise between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that when 2 triceps screws were used, both groups were stable during light exercise, but posterior-plating was stronger than double-plating.