DOI 10.1007/s00417-023-06302-y
Abilities of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and vascular density to discriminate stages in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To clarify the abilities of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT) obtained by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and circumpapillary vessel density (cpVD) measured by OCT-angiography to distinguish different stages in primary open-angle glaucoma determined by 24-2 or 30-2 static visual field (VF) testing.
METHODS
This retrospective study includes 25 healthy normal eyes of 25 subjects and 87 primary open-angle glaucoma eyes of 87 patients. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were evaluated for determining glaucoma stages using cpRNFLT and cpVD. The absolute errors of the estimated mean total deviation (mTD) using optimal models with cpRNFLT and cpVD were also compared.
RESULTS
The AUROCs for discriminating glaucomatous eyes from normal eyes was significantly higher for cpRNFLT than the respective AUROCs for cpVD (0.969 [95% CI 0.939 to 0.998] vs. 0.872 [95% CI 0.806 to 0.938], p = 0.006), whereas cpVD had significantly higher AUROC for discriminating severe glaucoma eyes from moderate glaucoma eyes than cpRNFLT (0.771 [95% CI 0.655 to 0.886] vs. 0.578 [95% CI 0.420 to 0.736], p = 0.022). The mean absolute error in estimating mTD using both cpRNFLT and cpVD was significantly less than the error using cpRNFLT alone (4.56 ± 3.76 dB vs. 5.39 ± 4.00 dB, p = 0.027).
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that cpVD is better for follow-ups after moderate stage. The combination of cpRNFLT and cpVD may improve VF estimation compared to cpRNFLT alone.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.