MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10006-021-01024-z

Медицинская библиотека · Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2022

Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.

de Assis Gleysson Matias, Dos Santos Victor Diniz Borborema, Queiroz Salomão Israel Monteiro Lourenço, Germano Adriano Rocha

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate fixation resistance in mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy in standardized polyurethane hemimandibles with two types of advancement (6 and 12 mm), with or without mandibular plane rotation, using a 2.0-mm plate/screw system.

METHODS

Seven groups were evaluated using a vertical compressive load in the first molar region, and the applied force in Newtons was recorded in 1 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm displacements, as well as the maximum force.

RESULTS

There was a statistical intergroup difference and it was observed that increasing the advancement decreased fixation resistance with a single plate, and inserting an additional plate significantly increased osteosynthesis resistance.

CONCLUSION

In the 12 mm advancements, clockwise rotation proved to be more resistant when fixed with only one plate. By contrast, counterclockwise rotation was significantly more resistant in stabilizing the mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy when two plates were used.

Для цитирования: de Assis Gleysson Matias, Dos Santos Victor Diniz Borborema, Queiroz Salomão Israel Monteiro Lourenço, Germano Adriano Rocha. Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-01024-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.