Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2020
Direct Rivaroxaban-Induced Factor XA Inhibition Proves to be Cardioprotective in Rats.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guillou Sophie, Beaumont Justine, Tamareille Sophie, Giraud Sebastien, Mirebeau-Prunier Delphine, Prunier Fabrice, Macchi Laurent
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction is a leading cause of death worldwide. Though highly beneficial, reperfusion of myocardium is associated with reperfusion injury. While indirect inhibition of Factor Xa has been shown to attenuate myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Our study sought to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban (RIV), a direct inhibitor of Factor Xa, on myocardial I/R injury and determine its cellular targets.
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used a rat model of 40-min coronary ligation followed by reperfusion. RIV (3 mg/kg) was given per os 1 h before reperfusion. Infarct size and myocardial proteic expression of survival pathways were assessed at 120 and 30 min of reperfusion, respectively. Plasmatic levels of P-selectin and von Willebrand factor were measured at 60 min of reperfusion. Cellular RIV effects were assessed using hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R) models on human umbilical vein endothelial cells and on rat cardiomyoblasts (H9c2 cell line).
KEY RESULTS: RIV decreased infarct size by 21% (42.9% vs. 54.2% in RIV-treated rats and controls respectively, P < 0.05) at blood concentrations similar to human therapeutic (387.7 ± 152.3 ng/mL) levels. RIV had no effect on H/R-induced modulation of endothelial phenotype, nor did it alter myocardial activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinase and survivor activating factor enhancement pathways at 30 min after reperfusion. However, RIV exerted a cytoprotective effect on H9c2 cells submitted to H/R.
CONCLUSIONS: RIV decreased myocardial I/R injury in rats at concentrations similar to human therapeutic ones. This protection was not associated with endothelial phenotype modulation but rather with potential direct cytoprotection on cardiomyocytes.
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used a rat model of 40-min coronary ligation followed by reperfusion. RIV (3 mg/kg) was given per os 1 h before reperfusion. Infarct size and myocardial proteic expression of survival pathways were assessed at 120 and 30 min of reperfusion, respectively. Plasmatic levels of P-selectin and von Willebrand factor were measured at 60 min of reperfusion. Cellular RIV effects were assessed using hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R) models on human umbilical vein endothelial cells and on rat cardiomyoblasts (H9c2 cell line).
KEY RESULTS: RIV decreased infarct size by 21% (42.9% vs. 54.2% in RIV-treated rats and controls respectively, P < 0.05) at blood concentrations similar to human therapeutic (387.7 ± 152.3 ng/mL) levels. RIV had no effect on H/R-induced modulation of endothelial phenotype, nor did it alter myocardial activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinase and survivor activating factor enhancement pathways at 30 min after reperfusion. However, RIV exerted a cytoprotective effect on H9c2 cells submitted to H/R.
CONCLUSIONS: RIV decreased myocardial I/R injury in rats at concentrations similar to human therapeutic ones. This protection was not associated with endothelial phenotype modulation but rather with potential direct cytoprotection on cardiomyocytes.