Genome biology · 2026
Benchmarking protein sequence and structure search methods for remote homology detection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Yuan, Zhou Yingquan, Huang Yan, Xin Hongyi, Pan Xiaoyong, Shen Hong-Bin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Protein sequence and structure similarity-based search is an important task, which underpins protein annotation, evolutionary analysis, large-scale functional inference, and the exploration of the protein "dark space". The rapid growth of sequence and predicted structure databases has spurred diverse search methods, yet their evaluation remains limited to fold-level similarity and inconsistent benchmarking protocols.
RESULTS: We present a comprehensive benchmark for protein sequence and structure search. Using this framework, we evaluate 14 representative methods spanning sequence alignment, structure alignment, and representation-based approaches across multiple biologically relevant scenarios. Our results show pronounced and context-dependent differences among methods. Structure alignment methods excel at detecting fold-level and geometric similarity, while representation-based searching approaches show advantages in capturing functional similarity under low sequence identity and robustness to predicted structures. Notably, all evaluated methods show limited effectiveness on intrinsically disordered proteins.
CONCLUSIONS: This benchmark establishes a standardized framework for evaluating protein similarity search methods, providing a practical resource for method selection and a foundation for the development of next-generation approaches capable of addressing diverse homology search challenges.
RESULTS: We present a comprehensive benchmark for protein sequence and structure search. Using this framework, we evaluate 14 representative methods spanning sequence alignment, structure alignment, and representation-based approaches across multiple biologically relevant scenarios. Our results show pronounced and context-dependent differences among methods. Structure alignment methods excel at detecting fold-level and geometric similarity, while representation-based searching approaches show advantages in capturing functional similarity under low sequence identity and robustness to predicted structures. Notably, all evaluated methods show limited effectiveness on intrinsically disordered proteins.
CONCLUSIONS: This benchmark establishes a standardized framework for evaluating protein similarity search methods, providing a practical resource for method selection and a foundation for the development of next-generation approaches capable of addressing diverse homology search challenges.