MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1357633x17733503

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2017

Clavicle fracture management: A comparison of a tertiary hospital and rural telehealth sites.

McKerrow Megan, North John

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The clavicle is one of the most commonly fractured bones in the adult population. Management has traditionally been conservative, however more recent research has yielded higher non-union rates associated with non-operative management. This study aims to analyse the proportion of operative and non-operative treatment methods for clavicle fracture in a tertiary hospital facility and rural health sites accessed via telehealth, comparing patient outcome between these two methods of fracture management. Following ethical approval, a retrospective review was conducted of patients presenting with clavicle fractures to the Princess Alexandra Hospital Fracture Clinics and to Orthopaedic Fracture Clinics run via teleconference with rural health sites. Only 2% of patients received operative fracture management in the telehealth group, versus 33% in the tertiary hospital sample. Patient outcome was measured in the larger tertiary hospital sample, with clinical notes reflecting good patient outcome in 70% of operatively managed patients and 85% of patients with conservatively managed clavicle fractures. For the patients in the telehealth sample that returned for follow-up appointments, 93% reported a good outcome with one of these individuals undergoing operative treatment and the rest managed conservatively.

Для цитирования: McKerrow Megan, North John. Clavicle fracture management: A comparison of a tertiary hospital and rural telehealth sites.. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1357633x17733503.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.