La Clinica terapeutica · 2021
A combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach for distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures in adults.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Touloupakis G, Messori M, Gilli A, Theodorakis E, Ghirardelli S, Indelli P F, Antonini G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the hume-rus can be challenging. The success lies in achieving a stable fixation that could allow early functional recovery. Our aim is to combine dif-ferent approaches already reported, to obtain an ideal surgical strategy for treating these fracture patterns.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we present the clinical outco-me of a 12-patient cohort in which we used a combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach to the distal humerus. The mean age of the group was 50 years (range 17 - 88). Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and thereafter, depending on the necessity of a further control. Patients' range of motion (ROM) of the elbow was reported, and functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).The minimum follow-up was fixed at 12 months.
RESULTS: Union was achieved in all fractures. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 12-21), none of the patients complained of any limitation in daily activities. The ROM at the last follow-up was complete in eight patients. Instead, three patients had ROM limitations, but none of them mentioned limitations in the activities of daily living. We observed a single iatrogenic radial nerve palsy undergoing a full functional recovery at the final follow-up. No further complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: We believe that the here presented modified approach could represent a solution that meets the modern demands for both ro-bust fixation and early mobilization, with minimal soft tissues damage around distal humeral fractures.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we present the clinical outco-me of a 12-patient cohort in which we used a combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach to the distal humerus. The mean age of the group was 50 years (range 17 - 88). Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and thereafter, depending on the necessity of a further control. Patients' range of motion (ROM) of the elbow was reported, and functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).The minimum follow-up was fixed at 12 months.
RESULTS: Union was achieved in all fractures. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 12-21), none of the patients complained of any limitation in daily activities. The ROM at the last follow-up was complete in eight patients. Instead, three patients had ROM limitations, but none of them mentioned limitations in the activities of daily living. We observed a single iatrogenic radial nerve palsy undergoing a full functional recovery at the final follow-up. No further complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: We believe that the here presented modified approach could represent a solution that meets the modern demands for both ro-bust fixation and early mobilization, with minimal soft tissues damage around distal humeral fractures.