Symptomatic ossicle lesion at the anterior tip of the medial malleolus in soccer players.

BACKGROUND

Unfused accessory ossification centers in the medial ankle are sometimes misdiagnosed and should be distinguished from other bone lesions such as fracture, stress fracture, os subtibiale, or pseudoarthrosis of the medial malleolus. The purpose of this study was to report our experience in treating soccer players with bony elements in the subtibial region.

METHODS

We surgically treated seven soccer players who experienced medial ankle pain with bony fragments at the tip of the medial malleolus. Their ages were between 13 and 27 years. The mean duration from symptom onset to hospital visit was 4.7 years (range: 2 months to 14 years). The bony lesion located at the anterior tip of the medial malleolus in all patients and we diagnosed the lesion as an unfused accessory ossification center.

RESULTS

Three types of surgical treatments were performed in patients according to age, ossicle size, status of the epiphyseal plate, and degenerative changes around the lesion. Bony fusion was achieved in patients who underwent open reduction and fusion with bone graft. Patients who underwent focal drilling or removal of the bony fragment experienced improvement in symptoms, and all patients were allowed to resume their sports or full preinjury activities.

CONCLUSION

We believe that surgery is the first-line treatment for the patients with unfused accessory ossification centers with their prolonged symptom and favorable outcomes can be expected. Bony fusion should be attempted in the patients with the large ossicle especially in their growth period.