MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1558944716658747

Медицинская библиотека · Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2016

The Scaphoid Staple: A Systematic Review.

Dunn John, Kusnezov Nicholas, Fares Austin, Mitchell Justin, Pirela-Cruz Miguel

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the indications, outcomes, and complications of scaphoid fixation with a staple.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed for all cases of the scaphoid staple. Five articles including 188 patients, of 77 primary scaphoid fractures and 111 other indications that included delayed union, nonunion, and avascular necrosis, were reviewed. Demographic data, outcomes, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The union rate of the scaphoid staple is 94.7%, and 95.7% of patients return to work after an average of 9.8 weeks after a 4.7-week period of immobilization. The complication rate was 9.0%, and 7.5% required hardware removal. Clinical and radiographic healing was higher in primary fractures as compared with other indications. Other indications, as compared with primary fracture, had a higher rate of hardware removal.

CONCLUSIONS

For all indications, the scaphoid staple has a high union rate and a low complication rate. In the authors' experience, the procedure is fast, not technically challenging, and may be considered for primary fracture, delayed union, nonunion, and avascular necrosis of the scaphoid.

Для цитирования: Dunn John, Kusnezov Nicholas, Fares Austin, Mitchell Justin, Pirela-Cruz Miguel. The Scaphoid Staple: A Systematic Review.. Hand (New York, N.Y.). 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716658747.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.