Treatment of type B pelvic fracture using anterior subcutaneous internal fixator with triple pedicle screws: a new surgical technique.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixator using triple pedicle screws (ASIF/TPS) in the treatment of unstable type B pelvic fracture compared with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 26 patients with type B unstable fractures that underwent ASIF/TPS and 26 similar patients that underwent ORIF using plates and screws. Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, and post operation hospitalization duration were compared. Anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet X-rays and 3D computed tomography were obtained. Pain, numbness, sexual dysfunction, and activity were evaluated at every follow-up visit until the implants were removed. The Majeed score was used to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

Blood loss, operating time, and hospitalization duration were less (all P < 0.001) in the ASIF/TPS group compared with the ORIF group. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the ASIF/TPS group after a mean follow-up of 6 months were excellent and good in 80.8%, and moderate in 19.2%. In comparison, the results of the ORIF group were excellent and good in 65.4%, moderate in 29.0%, and poor in 5.6%. No patient experienced nonunion, delayed union, superficial infection, or deep surgical wound infection. No urethral injury or dysuria occurred in the ASIF/TPS group. Two patients had temporary lateral femoral cutaneous nerve numbness after operation. There were two superficial wound infections in the ORIF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ASIF/TPS with triple pedicle screws could be a reasonable option for the treatment of type B unstable pelvic fractures.