In silico analysis of modular bone plates.

BACKGROUND

Inventory management or immediate availability of fracture plates can be problematic since for each surgical intervention a specific plate of varying size and functionality must be ordered. Modularization of the standard monolithic plate is proposed to address this issue.

METHODS

The effects of four different unit module design parameters (type, degree of modularization, connector screw diameter, sandwich ratio) on the plate bending stiffness and failure are investigated in a finite element four-point-bending analysis. A chosen, best-performing modular plate is then tested in silico for a simple diaphyseal tibial fracture scenario under anatomical compressional, torsional, and bending loads.

RESULTS

A modularization strategy is proposed to match the monolithic plate bending properties as closely as possible. With the best combination of design parameters, a fully modularized equivalent length plate with a 42.3% decrease in stiffness and 46.2% decrease in strength could be assembled. The chosen modular plate also displayed sufficient mechanical performance under the fracture fixation scenarios for a potentially successful osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Via computational methods, the viability of the modularization strategy as an alternate to the traditional monolithic plate is demonstrated. As a further realized advantage, the modular plates can alleviate stress shielding thanks to the reduced stiffness.