DOI 10.1097/wno.0000000000001959
Retinal Thickness in Essential Tremor and Early Parkinson Disease: Exploring Diagnostic Insights.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Essential tremor (ET) represents a heterogeneous condition which may overlap with Parkinson disease (PD) even at early stages, by sharing some subtle clinical aspects. Longstanding ET demonstrated also higher risk of developing PD, especially with a Tremor-dominant (TD-PD) phenotype. Therefore, differential diagnosis between ET and early PD could be quite challenging. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been recognized as a reliable tool to assess the retina as a proxy of neurodegeneration. We aimed to explore the possible role of retinal assessment in differential diagnosis between ET and early PD.
METHODS
Macular layers and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness among ET, early PD, and healthy controls (HCs) were assessed using OCT.
RESULTS
Forty-two eyes from 23 ET, 41 eyes from 21 early PD, and 33 eyes from 17 HCs were analyzed. Macular RNFL, ganglion cell layer, inner plexiform layer, and inner nuclear layer were thinner in PD as compared with ET and even more in HCs. Differences between ET and PD were more evident when considering the TD-PD subgroup, especially for RNFL. Among ET patients, thickness of the inner macular layers showed negative linear relationship with both age at onset and disease duration. Peripapillary temporal quadrant thinning was found in ET compared with HCs.
CONCLUSIONS
Macular inner retina was thinner in patients with ET and early PD compared with HCs. These findings suggest that the retinal assessment may have a utility in the differential diagnosis between ET and PD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.