MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i09.1928

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2020

The Use a Prophylactic Intramedullary Tibial Nail for a Stress Fracture in a High-Level Athlete.

Collins Devin W, Antekeier David P

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Mid-diaphyseal anterior tibial stress fractures can be debilitating injuries. They have been described occurring in athletes due to repetitive lower extremity trauma. The purpose of our study was to highlight a case of an athlete sustaining a tibial stress fracture with multiple cortical defects.

CASE REPORT: We present an 18-year-old collegiate bound athlete who sustained a tibial stress fracture with multiple cortical defects. The clinical decision, after failure of conservative treatment, was made to treat the patient with tibial intramedullary nailing. She was able to return to full unrestricted activities, including high-level sports participation. Our case report specifically describes a case of a high-level athlete with multiple anterior tibial linear cortical defects from a chronic stress fracture.

CONCLUSION

When conservative management for mid-diaphyseal anterior stress fractures fails, the utilization of prophylactic tibial nailing is a viable option. The decision for surgical intervention is dependent on many factors including patient's activity level and characteristics, failure of conservative management, and radiographic evidence of non-healing stress fractures.

Для цитирования: Collins Devin W, Antekeier David P. The Use a Prophylactic Intramedullary Tibial Nail for a Stress Fracture in a High-Level Athlete.. Journal of orthopaedic case reports. 2020. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i09.1928.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.