The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2021
Bonding between implant attachment pickup materials and CAD-CAM denture base material.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Panittaveekul Meenarin, Phasuk Kamolphob, Levon John, Chu Tien-Min G
Аннотация
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Adequate bonding between pickup material and the newer generation of prepolymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) for computer-aided-design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dentures is essential to the success of treatment. However, studies on the bond between these 2 materials are lacking.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of 3 different chairside implant LOCATOR attachment pickup material groups and prepolymerized PMMA by investigating their pushout force.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prepolymerized PMMA, (Lucitone 199) was used as the denture base material. The material was cut into 25×25×5-mm disks, and a Ø6.5-mm hole was drilled into the center of the disks. Six pickup materials from 3 groups were tested: composite resin with bonding agent (N=3, EZ PickUp, Quick Up, and Triad gel), composite resin without bonding agent (N=1, Chairside), and acrylic resin (N=2, Jet denture repair acrylic, and Duralay). All materials were prepared as per the manufacturers' recommendations and were used to fill the center hole. The specimens were left for 48 hours to completely polymerize before testing. Half of the specimens from each material then received thermocycling treatment. All specimens were subjected to axial pushout testing with a universal testing machine.
RESULTS: In the nonthermocycled specimens, Duralay and Jet denture repair acrylic resin showed significantly higher pushout force than that of the other groups (P<.001). Triad gel showed higher pushout force than EZ PickUp and Quick Up (P<.001). Chairside showed the lowest push-out force. The same trend was also observed in the thermocycled specimens. The peak pushout force of nonthermocycled Chairside composite resin was significantly lower than that of thermocycled Chairside composite resin (P=.03). Conversely, the peak pushout force of nonthermocycled EZ PickUp specimens was significantly higher than that of thermocycled EZ PickUp specimens (P=.01). Variation in fracture patterns among groups was observed, and the correlation between pushout force and fracture patterns was recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Two materials from the acrylic resin group, Jet denture repair acrylic and Duralay, showed higher pushout forces, indicating a better bond with Lucitone 199 CAD-CAM denture base material compared with other tested materials, including composite resin with bonding agent (EZ PickUp, Quick Up, and Triad gel) and composite resin without bonding agent (Chairside).
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of 3 different chairside implant LOCATOR attachment pickup material groups and prepolymerized PMMA by investigating their pushout force.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prepolymerized PMMA, (Lucitone 199) was used as the denture base material. The material was cut into 25×25×5-mm disks, and a Ø6.5-mm hole was drilled into the center of the disks. Six pickup materials from 3 groups were tested: composite resin with bonding agent (N=3, EZ PickUp, Quick Up, and Triad gel), composite resin without bonding agent (N=1, Chairside), and acrylic resin (N=2, Jet denture repair acrylic, and Duralay). All materials were prepared as per the manufacturers' recommendations and were used to fill the center hole. The specimens were left for 48 hours to completely polymerize before testing. Half of the specimens from each material then received thermocycling treatment. All specimens were subjected to axial pushout testing with a universal testing machine.
RESULTS: In the nonthermocycled specimens, Duralay and Jet denture repair acrylic resin showed significantly higher pushout force than that of the other groups (P<.001). Triad gel showed higher pushout force than EZ PickUp and Quick Up (P<.001). Chairside showed the lowest push-out force. The same trend was also observed in the thermocycled specimens. The peak pushout force of nonthermocycled Chairside composite resin was significantly lower than that of thermocycled Chairside composite resin (P=.03). Conversely, the peak pushout force of nonthermocycled EZ PickUp specimens was significantly higher than that of thermocycled EZ PickUp specimens (P=.01). Variation in fracture patterns among groups was observed, and the correlation between pushout force and fracture patterns was recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Two materials from the acrylic resin group, Jet denture repair acrylic and Duralay, showed higher pushout forces, indicating a better bond with Lucitone 199 CAD-CAM denture base material compared with other tested materials, including composite resin with bonding agent (EZ PickUp, Quick Up, and Triad gel) and composite resin without bonding agent (Chairside).