MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1565928

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of wrist surgery · 2015

Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Following Headless Screw Fixation.

Rancy Schneider K, Zelken Jonathan A, Lipman Joseph D, Wolfe Scott W

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background Headless screw fixation of scaphoid fractures and nonunions yields predictably excellent outcomes with a relatively low complication profile. However, intramedullary implants affect the load to failure and stress distribution within bone and may be implicated in subsequent fracture. Case Description We describe a posttraumatic fracture pattern of the scaphoid proximal pole originating at the previous headless screw insertion site in three young male patients with healed scaphoid nonunions. Each fracture was remarkably similar in shape and size, comprised the volar proximal pole, and was contiguous with the screw entry point. Treatment was challenging but successful in all cases. Literature Review Previous reports have posited that stress-raisers secondary to screw orientation may be implicated in subsequent peri-implant fracture of the femoral neck. Repeat scaphoid fracture after screw fixation has also been reported. However, the shape and locality of secondary fracture have not been described, nor has the potential role of screw fixation in the production of distinct fracture patterns. Clinical Relevance Hand surgeons must be aware of this difficult complication that may follow antegrade headless screw fixation of scaphoid fracture nonunion, and of available treatment strategies.

Для цитирования: Rancy Schneider K, Zelken Jonathan A, Lipman Joseph D, Wolfe Scott W. Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Following Headless Screw Fixation.. Journal of wrist surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565928.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.